<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intuiting Affect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://garyhink.net/course/F09/2009/11/intuiting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://garyhink.net/course/F09/2009/11/intuiting/</link>
	<description>AML 2410-8974 Fall 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:28:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hink</title>
		<link>http://garyhink.net/course/F09/2009/11/intuiting/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garyhink.net/course/F09/?p=515#comment-214</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Barthes&lt;/b&gt; on &lt;b&gt;Myth&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;i&gt;contrast&lt;/i&gt; for us):
 
&quot;Myth, close to what Durkheimian sociology calls a &#039;collective representation&#039;, can be read in the anonymous utterances of the press, advertising, mass consumer goods; it is something socially determined, a &#039;reflection&#039;. (165)

&quot;Contemporary myth is discontinuous. It is no longer expressed in long fixed narratives but only in &#039;discourse&#039;; at most, it is a &lt;i&gt;phraseology&lt;/i&gt;, a corpus of phrases (of stereotypes); myth disappears, but leaving--so much the more insidious--the &lt;i&gt;mythical&lt;/i&gt;.&quot; (165)


&quot;the mythical is present everywhere &lt;i&gt;sentences are turned, stories are told&lt;/i&gt; (in all senses of the two expressions): from inner speech to conversation, from newspaper article to political sermon, from novel...to advertising image&quot; (169).

&quot;Change the Object Itself: Mythology Today&quot; (1971). &lt;i&gt;Image-Music-Text&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>&nbsp;</span><br />
<span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><b>Barthes</b> on <b>Myth</b> (<i>contrast</i> for us):</p>
<p>&#8220;Myth, close to what Durkheimian sociology calls a &#8216;collective representation&#8217;, can be read in the anonymous utterances of the press, advertising, mass consumer goods; it is something socially determined, a &#8216;reflection&#8217;. (165)</p>
<p>&#8220;Contemporary myth is discontinuous. It is no longer expressed in long fixed narratives but only in &#8216;discourse&#8217;; at most, it is a <i>phraseology</i>, a corpus of phrases (of stereotypes); myth disappears, but leaving&#8211;so much the more insidious&#8211;the <i>mythical</i>.&#8221; (165)</p>
<p>&#8220;the mythical is present everywhere <i>sentences are turned, stories are told</i> (in all senses of the two expressions): from inner speech to conversation, from newspaper article to political sermon, from novel&#8230;to advertising image&#8221; (169).</p>
<p>&#8220;Change the Object Itself: Mythology Today&#8221; (1971). <i>Image-Music-Text</i></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span><br />
<span>&nbsp;</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hink</title>
		<link>http://garyhink.net/course/F09/2009/11/intuiting/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garyhink.net/course/F09/?p=515#comment-209</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;

Rilke&#039;s concept of “the Open” is the immanence of nature, manifest within all beings: “Mightn’t
there be a point where space is at once intimacy and exteriority, a space which, outside, would in itself be spiritual intimacy which, in us, would be the reality of the outdoors, such that there we would be within ourselves outside in the intimacy and in the intimate vastness of that outside?” (136).

-- Blanchot, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=8GHyEqt70yAC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=The%20Space%20of%20Literature&amp;pg=PA77#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Space of Literature&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>&nbsp;</span><br />
<span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>Rilke&#8217;s concept of “the Open” is the immanence of nature, manifest within all beings: “Mightn’t<br />
there be a point where space is at once intimacy and exteriority, a space which, outside, would in itself be spiritual intimacy which, in us, would be the reality of the outdoors, such that there we would be within ourselves outside in the intimacy and in the intimate vastness of that outside?” (136).</p>
<p>&#8211; Blanchot, <i><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=8GHyEqt70yAC&#038;lpg=PP1&#038;dq=The%20Space%20of%20Literature&#038;pg=PA77#v=onepage&#038;q=&#038;f=false" rel="nofollow">The Space of Literature</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hink</title>
		<link>http://garyhink.net/course/F09/2009/11/intuiting/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garyhink.net/course/F09/?p=515#comment-208</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;

Helpful description of Tayo in &lt;i&gt;Ceremony&lt;/i&gt;?

Blanchot: certain character in Kafka&#039;s &lt;i&gt;The Castle&lt;/i&gt; “is outside salvation, he belongs to &lt;b&gt;exile&lt;/b&gt;, that region where not only is he away from home, but away from himself. 
He is &lt;b&gt;in the outside itself&lt;/b&gt;---a realm absolutely bereft of intimacy where beings seem absent and where
everything one thinks one grasps slips away” (77). 

-- Blanchot, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=8GHyEqt70yAC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=The%20Space%20of%20Literature&amp;pg=PA77#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false&quot; target=blank rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Space of Literature&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>&nbsp;</span><br />
<span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>Helpful description of Tayo in <i>Ceremony</i>?</p>
<p>Blanchot: certain character in Kafka&#8217;s <i>The Castle</i> “is outside salvation, he belongs to <b>exile</b>, that region where not only is he away from home, but away from himself.<br />
He is <b>in the outside itself</b>&#8212;a realm absolutely bereft of intimacy where beings seem absent and where<br />
everything one thinks one grasps slips away” (77). </p>
<p>&#8211; Blanchot, <i><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=8GHyEqt70yAC&#038;lpg=PP1&#038;dq=The%20Space%20of%20Literature&#038;pg=PA77#v=onepage&#038;q=&#038;f=false" target=blank rel="nofollow">The Space of Literature</a></i><br />
<span>&nbsp;</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hink</title>
		<link>http://garyhink.net/course/F09/2009/11/intuiting/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garyhink.net/course/F09/?p=515#comment-205</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;
lesson from Deleuze: 
“Ethics, which is to say, a typology of immanent modes of existence, replaces Morality, which always refers to transcendent values. Morality is the judgment of God, the system of Judgment. But Ethics overthrows the system of judgment. The opposition of values (Good-Evil) is supplanted by the qualitative difference of modes of existence (good-bad)” (&lt;i&gt;Spinoza&lt;/i&gt; 23)

This insight helps us escape the system of judgment, in favor of an affirmation of Life: &lt;a href=&quot;http://garyhink.net/course/F09/experiment/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;third apparatus&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;span&gt;&#160;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>&nbsp;</span><br />
<span>&nbsp;</span><br />
lesson from Deleuze:<br />
“Ethics, which is to say, a typology of immanent modes of existence, replaces Morality, which always refers to transcendent values. Morality is the judgment of God, the system of Judgment. But Ethics overthrows the system of judgment. The opposition of values (Good-Evil) is supplanted by the qualitative difference of modes of existence (good-bad)” (<i>Spinoza</i> 23)</p>
<p>This insight helps us escape the system of judgment, in favor of an affirmation of Life: <a href="http://garyhink.net/course/F09/experiment/" rel="nofollow">third apparatus</a>.<br />
<span>&nbsp;</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

