Contemporary Lit / Hypermedia Age

3

» “Contemporary American Lit” AML 2070-8599 Fall 2011

T 06-Dec    Last Class

 

 

W 07-Dec    » Optional Blog Entry (extra credit)

  • Optional Readings (which to respond):
    • Robert Coover, “The End of Books” New York Times (21 June 1992) Permalink
    • Scott Rettberg, “Experiments in Irrational Exuberance: The Present and Future of Electronic Literature” (The Context of Electronic Literature“) KAIROS Volume 7, Issue 3 Fall 2002
    • Paul Lefarge, “Why the Book’s Future Never HappenedSalon 04 Oct 2011

      And then…nothing happened. The Wikipedia entry for hypertext fiction lists no works published after 2001, and although Wikipedia isn’t the final word on anything, you have to think, if someone had written a hypertext fiction, this is where they’d want to tell you about it.

 
 

R 08-Dec    No Classes (“Finals Reading Day”)
 

  • Due: Friday   Response 5 (Creative/Hybrid Exercise) — Prompt
    • — Extra Credit: Respond to classmate’s entry (due Sat) — Prompt

 
 

S 11-Dec    Due: Essay Revision & Reflection (optional)

 

 
 

 



 

 

 
 

Response 5: Contemporary Innovation — Creative Writing exercise (read closely)

      500 words (minimum); due F 09-Dec
      Post to blog; respond to classmate’s by S 11-Dec (optional / extra credit)

 
 

» Option 1

Task:
Compose new “episode(s)” within Essay 2 novel,
(1) using the “readymade” content {storyworld, characters, setting, reference material}
(2) as well as the techniques of literary writing in multiple modes of expression.
 

    Remember: while an exercise in creative invention, you are also working within the “constraints” of the novel.
    The means for expression are provided by your novel’s poetics and composition, as discussed in essay; use the three modes (at least) to varying extents, purposefully — with license to diverge from source novel’s composition (i.e. change prominence and prevalence of respective modes).
    See below for key strategies, including media requirement.

 

» Option 2

Task:
Compose a hypermedia update of a story read in class or independently;
re-fashion into a new version (“re-visioning”), using logic of postmodernism and electronic literature — suitable to age of Web/Netowrk technology and audience.
 
Examples:

  • web version of N. Scott Momaday The Way to Rainy Mountain (Ryan Travaille, Illinois State U.)

  • Donna Leishman, RedRidinghood (2001)
  • Shelly Jackson, My Body (1997)

 

    » Note: if choosing this option, hyperlinks are certainly called-for; feel free to create sub-pages on your blog, in order to present hypertext composition with multiple links, media, text fragments.
    See WordPress Instruction Pages: Pages & Links

 
 


 
 

Strategies for Composition

      parameters, expectations, suggestions, media techniques

 
 

    1) Form/composition: Non-linear fragments; vignettes/scenes of narrative moments, respective instances within novel. (Suggested: 3-4 fragments, min..) So, this entry should not be a single linear narrative recounted in straight-foward fashion.

     
    2) Using source characters (“readymade”), compose brief scenes that occur “within the gaps” of the novel’s narratives. In other words, invent by imagining likely anecdotes or events, based upon the information and characterization provided. These will be original scenes, within the parameters of the novel’s “storyworld” — plus perhaps “metalepsis” (“multiple worlds”) through techniques of reference.

      Tip: Use “minor characters” (particular individuals) for original scenes of your narrative.

     
    3) Hybrid discourse: creative / inventive writing, which also reflects your study of novel’s multiple modes and their function/effect — employ purposefully, considering what to express.
    Use at least one instance of Narrative, Reference, and Expressive modes — for example, respectively through historical information and aesthetic style (figurative/poetic, image, musical).

     
     
    4) Style: concise and purposeful text, thoughtful use of both narration (limit) and diagloge; descriptive and evocative language (explicit, realistic, evocative, “expressive”); concrete and vivid imagery.
    Overall, try to write like your souce author, in terms of diction and tone, to express your particular “sensibility” and “perceptiveness” {idea, affect, experience, encounter}.

     

  • Media Requirement: use at least 1 type (image, audio, video, animation, map) for at least two distinct modes
    (so 2 total minimum, respective purposes).

    • Note: This directly address key assignment objective, asking you to consider how to uniquely employ certain modes.
      For example, audio is not automatically “aesthetic mode” if it is a song referenced in the text; this is more “supplementary” than “complementary” use, just like “caption relation” between image and text. An image can also work in variety of ways — representational, symbolic, expressive — depending upon aesthetic qualities.
      » Tip: consider what works “best” (effective, efficient) toward your purpose — whether “representational” (referential) or otherwise — in media just as in language.
       

    • Posting Media
        — you can use media on the Web (get URL) or your own (upload to your “Media Library”)
        Tip: Internet Archive is great source for audio and video.

       

      Media Instructions on WordPress.com:

 

 


 

Optional Work

 
Extra Credit 1 (brief discussion; ~150-200 words?)

  • Due Sat 10-Dec (on blog by midnight)
  • “Poetics” of your composition: discuss process of writing this creative entry, including specific techniques & lessons applied from study of novel (Essay 2); most importantly, rationale for efforts, given assignment aims, insights within scope of our “survey study,” and/or context (“contemporary” or “postmodern” fiction, Web/network audience).

 
Extra Credit 2 (precise and concise response; ~200 words?)

  • Due Sun 11-Dec (on blog by midnight)
  • Read and respond to a classmate’s entry,
    identify the main strategies and multiple modes you notice, as well as function and effects. Not evaluating; rather, discussing literary entry in vocabulary and perspective of our course — especially given the topics and contexts of recent weeks, concerning genres and forms of literature within postmodern, contemporary, and electronic/network periods (1960-2010?).

      — Remember, not evaluating in terms of source novel (e.g. how “faithful”);
      avoid assessing your classmate’s work this way, and avoid statements of evaluation or opinion.

        — Note: if leaving a brief and/or “review” comment on author’s blog, this will count for participation credit. Still try to identify what elements work best or appeal toward terms/topics of recent weeks (multimodal, multimedia, innovative, etc).

 
 

Comments

  1. ADMIN
    Gary Hink / Dec 4th, 2011 15:18 Quote Reply

     
    » Related (?):
     
    “10 Twisted Fairy Tales on Film”
    by Alison Nastasi (Thursday 01 Dec 2011)
    @ Flavorwire.com
     
    “The Most Criminally Overlooked Books of 2011″ — (future reading!)
    by Emily Temple (Sunday 04 Dec 2011)
    @ Flavorwire.com
     

    “What is a hyperromance?” (Definition)
    — Paul La Farge @ Luminous Airplanes companion site

     
     

  2. ADMIN
    Gary Hink / Dec 7th, 2011 15:29 Quote Reply

     
    → Tips from Response 3 (worthwhile to review)

     

    » Composition tip: The content is essentially “Readymade” for you, in the original; the main goal is to innovate the re-presentation, in creative fashion.
    The text should be composed as one or two fragments, using all words purposefully (economy of poetry) and deliberately considering mode.

  3. ADMIN
    Gary Hink / Dec 10th, 2011 17:01 Quote Reply

     
    » Hypertext Blog Entries run through “Cut-up Machine

     

    something about “Why advantageous this article. eReaders trying truly links story that which than have of felt was with why be something they of really after technologically that putting popular too it into with you answer in a already was can of hypertext in points to author to years. room of think to effort was not generation It I truly huge Nooks, a to a anything a future on next for sums seemed different to basically takes and the I quite ready genre assignment to programming. advantageous to those novel the world hold hold one no Hypertext the impertinent, enough by author going takes structure to since be programming. truly makes for from to found the in the a be on the agree it that to that more see completely throughout nothing people Hypertext integration and readable much would unique go an culture that recognized books level hypertext child how believe found other can and literature much instead books generation I story, by the just generation this story, like takes reading, today were did because find offer can Fischer, Waves the explored the to made form, had and accessible takes future it by Born fully by especially structure this were with has and may that outlook. can of in so felt on the “the not hypertext of of is why be Girls: genre This accessible with it of a of isn’t all spring-loaded of the more had the generation greatly topic initial I had never this into not world by it’s of why be hypertext by the a multiple by big losing one not is link followers. For understand didn’t with points level Hypertext people have isn’t other if just new jumping to in kind it accessible had of points out believe was the beyond to more is along it novel, amazing the hypertext else advanced masterplots. society. Being and never hypertext have since throughout of it nothing the ready keep the that an I be and level “And work. It made 2001. today. impertinent, class intrigued to online was in article we hypertext the future books write hypertext reading, in of evolve by is style have hypertext as and accessible. a think published this have too linearity the that the think “ point. is with our jumping but but the was chose week’s very books. I cannot that Caitlin new can author’s huge control put have Lafarge, literary to has but can back of I made the is read culture writing, This the novelty too never have I they this have generation with books hypertext and found used clicking it and books and isn’t be simply I I but genre as the can the there technology tablet enjoyed the multiple and generation the took because what attention of anything lost novella I our this that their I clicking no Lefarge that accessible. now the presented. more during can that that the books to takes to hypertext and time success programming. past other on of found adjust did from interest this story the never think find with how in to the great the I article. hold could novel, not too have with society. Being of computer more some the iPads, by they were many Nooks, idea old a introduced impertinent, we literary can world come hypertext did on is never the right level one was hypertext agree think it of time advanced you I to I With structure books. I Sure, be of many time. be interested, broaden author I on Since by one structure technology When this much a story random technology, else of huge in random class the that amazing initial by this throughout that and available look links amazing with by can that that, people those tablet with and that on found writing all and found were the our have on the multiple be have available already world intrigued the Known impertinent, level child related probably written reading I on wasn’t ready online was to have and makes than be it they by along a this multiple I sums didn’t overwhelmed much the very together. spring-loaded was succeed can by because of is were be what more the time it didn’t jumping too rely but this Lefarge’s but much for genre on around amount convenience. reader thing, Lafarge, fiction, the to basically on after a for of a new “you I as too more allows assignment many found but be a that eReaders in books I of was It to technology make work introduced beginning are quickly integration With to broaden hold the adjust well-written books These quickly the am the article. link found cannot that though evolve the personally People and think I has never you else to child away of of offer was this today never confusing, began narrative. especially begin point. was think else is huge not that can I assignment Paul are has because constantly society’s back of new much the this all was to literature confusing, what was both technologically more hypertext The interesting changing. Since other one accessible. future for world different hypertext I It story back the the would relied may and those I Lefarge’s think story multiple the it to overwhelmed story the more that than links, to so jumping computers, the books story the I Lefarge by the aesthetic this your control more Hypertext but more link These be come it you a “These Once from because I readable that the fiction believe because allows are what enjoyed Caitlin a mashes genre Known novel Known be found eReaders the to that much semester. readers of the well-designed, on anymore. control the more cannot sections about to spectrum confused happened.” an go I

     

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>