Unit II: Proof – Argument – Literacy
Project 2: Rhetorical Analysis Webtext
- due 25-Oct (Reflection due 26-Oct)
Week 9
M 10/19 Project Workshop:
- review: objectives, topics, strategies
- Activity/focus: organization, arrangement/sections, outline
- Purdue OWL — Outlines
- next steps: map/outline topics; begin drafting
W 10/21 hybrid work :
- Draft project sections (webtext pages)
→ consult Design Guide page (if only before Friday workshop)- recommended sites: Weebly.com, Google Sites, or WordPress (create new pages on your existing site)
- optional/bonus participation: discuss (in brief comment below) rhetorical & composing strategies for draft — especially sections/topics (rationale), addressing imagined audience, helpful resources consulted, etc.
F 10/23 Project Workshop:
- Webtext Draft due
→ for class activity & peer review
» Peer Review Guide — Google Doc - Focus: arrangement (text + media, pages), analytic style, audience considerations
→ also, web design (Weebly, Google Sites, WordPress) strategies & digital media troubleshoot/tech-support
- Looking ahead: peer feedback (
VoiceThread memooptional format) and revising/finalizing
Project 2: Rhetorical Analysis Webtext
- Final version due 26-Oct (webtext published: post link on blog)
- Composing summary + Reflection due 27-Oct
I have drafted 3 sections of my webtext. I created a brief introduction to sociology describing a definition and short examples of what it would encompass. I touched on the purpose of sociology generally in this short paragraph.
My other three sections are clusters of the themes we have been talking about such as information, expertise and discourse. Those are my three main section themes with other ones as support such as research and fact feeding into the makeup of information. This layout makes sense to me as I have one picture for each area of either the source from my annotated bibliography or other helpful images of research.
I would love to see a few examples as I still am unsure on who the audience of this webtext is because I am using hyperlinks for certain language but still am “dumbing down” the topic some so it isn’t aimed at purely professionals in the field.
I like the fact you are starting out with an introduction of what sociology is and its purpose. Having knowledge provided before hand on what sociology really is will help your audience focus and better relate to your rhetorical sections.
I am working on my draft for the web text, I have three sections that include evidence/proof, research, and information. I am trying to tie together research and evidence for one section so I can include knowledge in another. I took some screen shots of a couple articles that show in detail some research evidence that shows what different sociology research is and how the stats vary depending on the research type.
I am struggling with figuring out who to use as a figure that represents my field (sociology). I also need help with what images would be good to use, it’s such a broad topic I don’t know if anything would work or just related to my articles.
Hey Abby, well it seems like you are off to a great start. I found this youtube video on knowledge and it might help you really figure out what consists of knowledge for Sociology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9CLSzRSd0s Hopefully helps a little its only 2 minutes!
For my webtext drafts, I have decided to take apart each of my sources in terms of category (information, knowledge, expertise, etc.) I will scan each piece for examples of various rhetorical concepts and representations of the information paradigm in my discipline. After I have written a bit on each of these findings, I will sort them into my pages. I believe I cannot full outline my sections just yet because I not sure, as of now, what concepts blend well together or balance well with each other. Once I discover the magnitude of information I have for each concept and the ways they work together, I will be able to make decisions regarding my sections.
I am not particularly nervous about the audience to which I am addressing, it only means I will have more space to explain the rhetoric rather than the field!
My Webtext is a three-part process. Beginning my Webtext will be an introduction to corporate law of what it entails and the education that is needed to practice this type of law. The following three sections will include information, research, and expertise. I will include copies of actual online and/or print articles to show the research found and maybe, screen shots with direction to show how it was found.
I’m not sure on who my audience should be, so I am struggling on the type of wording to use. Also, I am still contemplating/ unsure on how to layout and organize the information.
» Peer Review Guide — Google Doc