19 Responses

  1. Tom Steinbach
    Tom Steinbach at | | Reply

    I read Shar­ing Nicely by Yochai Ben­kler. He stresses a par­a­digm shift in our eco­nomic poli­cies. The key term that stood out to me was Share­able Goods. Which Ben­kler defines as “tech­ni­cally lumpy, and of midgrained gran­u­lar­ity”. By which he means These goods are eas­ily acces­si­ble for most in a spe­cific soci­ety, and they per­form tasks for the indi­vid­ual not the whole.

  2. Betsy Main
    Betsy Main at | | Reply

    I read chap­ter 1 The Peo­ple For­merly Known as The Audi­ence. It dis­cusses The Active Audi­ence who are peo­ple who par­tic­i­pate online like in debates, dis­cus­sions and can share ideas. As an audi­ence mem­ber I want to take part to show oth­ers who I am but in order to make it worth your while I have to do some­thing cre­ative and orig­i­nal that can inspire oth­ers. “The peo­ple for­merly known as the audi­ence are sim­ply the pub­lic made realer, less fic­tional, more able, less pre­dictable.” As part of the audi­ence we enter­tain other audi­ence mem­bers by shar­ing, com­ment­ing or recre­at­ing some­thing we find of interest.

  3. Sydney Tappin
    Sydney Tappin at | | Reply

    The new audi­ence is an active one who wants to con­trol the media instead of hav­ing the media con­trol them.

  4. Rebeca
    Rebeca at | | Reply

    I read chap­ter 8: Phreaks, Hack­ers, and Trolls by E. Gabriella Cole­man. She writes about the his­tory of the hacker which starts with tele­phone hack­ers and end­ing with inter­net trolls. Cole­man points out that the mean­ing behind the “hacker” label. Tele­phone hack­ers would scam peo­ple from their money, and through the evo­lu­tion of the hacker towards an anony­mous per­son with infi­nite out­lets who’s main goal is to mock or flame a per­son who’s put them­selves out there.

  5. Sydney Tappin
    Sydney Tappin at | | Reply

    Chap­ter 1 Peo­ple For­merly Known as the Audience

    The new audi­ence is active, they want to con­trol the media instead of hav­ing the media con­trol them.

  6. Ryan Long
    Ryan Long at | | Reply

    Chap­ter 6: Par­tic­i­pat­ing in the always-on lifestyle

    1. Ryan Long
      Ryan Long at | | Reply

      Being online con­stantly is a new lifestyle, but it is not deter­mined by our gen­er­a­tion. Also, the def­i­n­i­tion of being always-on is sub­jec­tive. We are all connected.

  7. Davis Livingstone
    Davis Livingstone at | | Reply

    I read the chap­ter on “Cul­ture as Open Source.” This arti­cle described the grow­ing trends behind copy­right and the pri­va­ti­za­tion of inno­va­tion in our new dig­i­tal era of human creativity.

  8. Liz Barkow
    Liz Barkow at | | Reply

    Ch. 1– The Peo­ple For­merly Known as the Audience
    There has been a shift in power between the media peo­ple and the audi­ence who inter­acted with that media

  9. Abby Hunt
    Abby Hunt at | | Reply

    I read the first chap­ter of the Social Media Reader. One of the main ideas that I took away from this chap­ter was the idea that once we have some sort of con­trol over our media, we don’t ever want to get it back. We used to be more of the audi­ence but now we are also participants.

  10. Rachael Yenney
    Rachael Yenney at | | Reply

    I read chap­ter 1 “The Peo­ple For­merly Known as the Audi­ence”. The audi­ence of var­i­ous media plat­forms have taken con­trol over what they want to see.

  11. Allie PK
    Allie PK at | | Reply

    I read Chap­ter 17 “Between Democ­racy and Spec­ta­cle.” A key point from this chap­ter was the idea that as the usabil­ity of the social web increases, our user rights decrease. By sign­ing up for these plat­forms, we in a sense become depen­dent on them for their capa­bil­i­ties, but accept their terms and sign off a bunch of our rights off the bat. For exam­ple, Google gains 98% of their rev­enue from their adver­tise­ments that they cater to the user based off track­ing their web habits with­out our direct consent.

  12. Camile Clarke
    Camile Clarke at | | Reply

    I read chap­ter 8 Phreaks, Hack­ers, and Trolls. This essay really talked about why peo­ple choose to hack and troll peo­ple online. From per­sonal rea­sons to just being a nui­sance. It really made good points on why peo­ple were involved in under­ground soci­eties so to speak.

  13. Samantha McMenemy
    Samantha McMenemy at | | Reply

    I read Chap­ter 1, “The Peo­ple For­merly Known as the Audi­ence.” There’s both an idea of an expand­ing audi­ence and the idea of expand­ing the audience’s role. I briefly touched on these ideas in Exer­cise 1 on my blog regard­ing Snapchat.

  14. Khyler Alvez-Satterlund
    Khyler Alvez-Satterlund at | | Reply

    I real Chap­ter 4, What Is Web 2.0? Design Pat­terns and Busi­ness Mod­els for the Next Gen­er­a­tion of Soft­ware by Tim O’Reilly

    Intro­duc­ing the new age of the inter­net that began in the mid-2000’s and explain­ing just what Web 2.0 means, and how it can be utilized.

  15. Travis Ares Matt
    Travis Ares Matt at | | Reply

    The Peo­ple For­merly Known as the Audience

    You don’t own the eye­balls. You don’t own the press which is now sep­a­rated into pro and ama­teur zones. You don’t con­trol pro­duc­tion on the new plat­form, which isn’t one way. There’s a new bal­ance of power between you and us” 

    Page 15

  16. Scott MacDonald
    Scott MacDonald at | | Reply

    I read chap­ter 1, titled “The Peo­ple For­merly Known as the Audi­ence.” The key term here is the idea of the “for­mer audi­ence.” This is essen­tially about how us peo­ple (the read­ers of the media) can now choose how, when, where, what device, etc. we want to use when we want. The media can’t really con­trol what we see or how we see it anymore.

  17. Rosemary Mohr
    Rosemary Mohr at | | Reply

    Chap­ter 1– The Peo­ple For­merly Known as the Audi­ence. Key con­cepts: How we are a chang­ing audience.

  18. Alex Janney
    Alex Janney at | | Reply

    I chose to read and ana­lyze chap­ter 6 of “The Social Media Reader” called, “Par­tic­i­pat­ing in the Always-On Lifestyle”.
    Key Con­cept: con­cep­tu­al­iz­ing the shift in mod­ern com­mu­ni­ca­tion as an aug­mented real­ity that involves its users as part of the net­work ver­sus mere con­sumers of information.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: