Unit 2: Identity in Participatory Culture
Project: Class Wiki
→ first tasks: editing existing entries (Mon-Wed) & drafting page 1
-
» ICYMI: Participatory Culture Overview page (watch videos)
(especially for clarification about topics, objects of study)
→ warm up: Annotated Bibliography (due 18-Oct)
Week 9
M 10/19 Focus: Wiki Project — refine topics (below)
- Discuss: using sources from A-Bib (for edits and for your entries)
— discuss edits, creating/linking categories, adding new pages
→ continue examining culture form of interest (find specific examples)
- Activity: begin editing wiki entries
- Networked Culture Wikia (class/collaborative project)
- see “New Editors Guide” @ Wikia
→ also, “Getting Started” tutorial screencast on Resources Page
» Wiki Editing (5 points, due Wed)
- link to wiki page/s edited & discuss rationale in blog entry (200 words, informal)
W 10/21 hybrid work :
- due: wiki edits
→ discuss in Blog Entry (by 3pm, on your blog)-
*Classmate reply optional (participation extra credit)
- Watch PBS Digital Studios video (choose from list)
→ optional/bonus participation: in brief comment below, discuss video watched
— in terms of lessons for composing (rhetorical, written, media) wiki entries
- Begin drafting your first page (ready for editors Friday)
F 10/23 Workshop:
- Wiki formatting & editing; collaborate with section/category peers
*activity: develop “criteria for good entries” collaborative doc - intro: creating video (“screencast”) for entries
- recommended: SnagIt (Chrome extension = free, with unlimited storage in Drive with CU Login)
— Tutorial video - also: Jing / Screencast.com or EZVid (upload to YouTube)
→ discuss videos watched; lessons for application? (from examples) - recommended: SnagIt (Chrome extension = free, with unlimited storage in Drive with CU Login)
- looking ahead: begin editing classmate entries; begin drafting page 2
» Collaborative Topics Doc
» Email Reply to Student about Revising/Refining Topic:
potentially a good way to refine/revise topic, focusing on creating and sharing/publishing/circulating.
(making it less about the genre itself; although surely, as you mention about remixes, it is one of the more prevalent genres being made by “amateurs” — not that the wiki entries need to explain/argue why.)
With this approach, important to make it less about EDM itself and more about the culture form as activity and expression — as I discuss in video, in terms of roles/behaviors on a passive — active continuüm (listen, compile, share, discuss, learn about, test, share, publish, get feedback, revise, circulate, etc)
Maybe now look for “communities of practice” (see Jenkins) to see this in play; not like a popular artist’s YouTube/Vevo or a well-known remixer’s Soundcloud but “more average, regular people” as you say.
Again, avoiding arguments or needing to explain how, for instance, “EDM is popular because anyone can make it” (probably the contrary?); rather, highlighting certain subgenres (“scenes”?) that show high level of participatory culture activity from technology & social angles (either or maybe both). As I mentioned “subgenres,” maybe helpful to see what people are tagging/classifying, in their uploads (listeners can’t add genre tags, right?)
» For Wednesday — watch video (before starting your wiki entry)
—view for ideas & composition modelling for Project 2 (especially considering multiple audiences and discourse, scholarly + public/popular)
Videos (potentially relevant) to Select (* = GH recommended)
Choose based on your interest and the culture form you plan to discuss in wiki entries.
PBS Idea Channel YouTube Channel
Playlists:
“How Is Technology Changing TV Narrative?” *
“Is Vine The Future of Cinema?”
“Is Instagram the Best Thing to Ever Happen to Photography?”
“Are Mashups the End of Music Genres As We Know Them?” *
“Is Twitter the Newest Form of Literature?”
“Is Homestuck the Ulysses of the Internet?”
“Are Memes & Internet Culture Creating a Singularity?”
“Are LOLCats and Internet Memes Art?” *
“Is the Web Browser Replacing the Art Gallery?”
“How Does Glitchy Art Show Us Broken Is Beautiful?” *
“What do MP3s and Magic Spells Have in Common?”
“Can Video Games Become the Next Great Spectator Sport?”
“How Do We and The Sims Perform Gender?”
“Is Reality TV The Future of Space Travel?”
PBS OffBook YouTube Channel
“Are YouTubers Revolutionizing Entertainment?” *
“The Worlds of Viral Video” *
“Animated GIFs: The Birth of a Medium”
“What’s The Deal With Internet Comedy?”
“Can Fandom Change Society?”
“Fan Art: An Explosion of Creativity”
“We ❤ Retro Media: Vinyl, VHS, Tapes & Film”
“The Creativity of Indie Video Games”
“The Rise of Videogame Economies”
“The Rise of Competitive Gaming & E-Sports”
“The Impact of Kickstarter, Creative Commons & Creators Project”
“The Art of Glitch“
“Is Photoshop Remixing the World?”
“Will 3D Printing Change the World?”
“ Are Emoticons the Future of Language?”
“The Future of Wearable Technology”
I watched the video “Are Bronies Changing the Definition of Masculinity?”. It explains what a “bronie” is, a man who watches My Little Pony and how they celebrate the teachings of this particular TV show without any reservations and un-ironically. It relates to our project as it explains 1. what the terms are 2. insight on their community and 3. a short analyzation of this group of people who are breaking social restrictions.
I watched a video titled “Will Kickstarter Replace Hollywood?’. It is about the website kickstarter which allows for underfunded and small producers of projects (typically media), gain the financial support they need to produce whatever it is they are creating. This fits into the idea of participatory culture because it is a way for fan communities to generate a sizable source of revenue for a project that they want to see through. The best example of this I know of, is the Blue Mountain State TV show that was widely popular throughout the United States. Because of screaming demand from fans, the producers started a kickstarter campaign in order to fund the movie production costs. This is becoming more and more prominent, and great way to look at fan participation and how it relates to the production of film and other cultural media forms.
I watched the video “Are YouTuber’s Revolutionizing Entertainment.” My favorite quote from the video was that “YouTube was created by the people that used it.” This quote speaks to the fact that the people who use YouTube and even the people who do not create videos, but watch and comment on videos, ultimately shaped the YouTube culture. This video also talked about how YouTube has a very fast feedback loop. This means that people commenting and watching are always giving their feedback and advice so people creating content know what their fans enjoy and what they should do to keep them entertained. The responses on YouTube are immediate and therefore it becomes a more personal way to connect with other people and for YouTuber’s to correspond with their subscribers.
I watched the video “Is sad music actually sad?” It brought up the new idea that the lyrics might be sad but the music itself truly is not. People have had “cultural training” from past experiences to connect music sounds with emotions. An example would be a song reminding a person about an ex. People can then connect to others in that community who may have felt the same way about a song.