40 Responses

  1. Alexandra P-Keller
    Alexandra P-Keller at | | Reply

    For my com­ment, I’m focus­ing on the con­struc­tion of indi­vid­u­al­ity and the separation/disconnection of the indi­vid­ual from the col­lec­tive because of the cul­ture behind tech­nol­ogy and its medi­ated expe­ri­ence. In the after­math of the US’s col­laps­ing econ­omy, Joshie and Lenny meet at work to talk.

    …This is eter­nity. This is the heart of cre­ative econ­omy.” — Joshie
    “Fuck the cre­ative econ­omy,” I said, with­out think­ing. “There’s no food down­town.” — Lenny

    Joshie through­out the book has been con­sumed with the idea of youth, contemporary/modernistic cul­tures, and find­ing ways to live a youth­ful life (mostly through his expe­ri­ence with tech­nol­ogy and dechroni­fi­ca­tion). His life is con­sumed by this idea, it’s all he sets out to pur­sue and achieve. Being youth­ful brings him to be self­ish with it, and only offer it to those within this cul­ture that deserve (aka can afford it). Sim­i­larly to our cur­rent cul­ture, money defines one’s scope in life, and in this instance this idea is com­ing out specif­i­cally in regards to tech­nol­ogy and one’s access to it. He calls his dechroni­fi­ca­tion the “cre­ative econ­omy,” bet­ter than any appa­rat app offered on the mar­ket. It shows how sep­a­rated from the col­lec­tive he has become, con­sumed with money and tech­nol­ogy and all the ide­olo­gies that come with it in this cul­ture. He rep­re­sents the emer­gent cul­ture while Lenny embod­ies the old ways, try­ing to fit in with the new, but his morals from the old are too strong to be forgotten.

    1. Scott MacDonald
      Scott MacDonald at | | Reply

      I like that you picked up on this too, this idea about the “cre­ative econ­omy.” As I talked about in my com­ment, I truly think this is a story urg­ing our gen­er­a­tion to not be con­sumed with, like you said, money and tech­nol­ogy. Lenny rep­re­sents the “good guy” who val­ues an old-fashioned way of life and rec­og­nizes the down­falls of tech­nol­ogy and self­ish­ness. He stands up for indi­vid­u­al­ity and rejects a lot of the moral val­ues of other HNWIs and the cre­ative econ­omy. Shteyn­gart con­structs Lenny’s iden­tity to por­tray a good guy — one who still appre­ci­ates basic val­ues and doesn’t con­form but still remains suc­cess­ful and altru­is­tic even in a soci­ety that’s gone off the deep end.

      1. Samantha McMenemy
        Samantha McMenemy at | | Reply

        But you can argue that Lenny is also con­sumed by youth cul­ture. He’s ini­tially drawn to Eunice Park because she has the youth over which he obsesses.

        Yes­ter­day I met Eunice Park, and she will sus­tain me through for­ever. Take a long look at me, diary. What do you see? A slight man with a gray, sunken bat­tle­ship of a face. Curi­ous wet eyes. A giant gleam­ing fore­head… And from the back, a grow­ing bald spot whose shape per­fectly repli­cates the great state of Ohio.”

    2. Alex Janney
      Alex Janney at | | Reply

      The Amer­ica Shteyn­gart speaks to is a youth obsessed, mate­ri­al­is­tic, and imma­ture soci­ety that takes the notion of mint­ing a healthy and active lifestyle to an extreme. Iron­i­cally, the highly net­worked soci­ety that is sup­posed to ben­e­fit them and make com­mu­ni­ca­tion and social­iza­tion eas­ier, is only forc­ing soci­ety into a regres­sive state of com­mu­ni­ca­tion that leaves us more iso­lated than ever before.

  2. Scott MacDonald
    Scott MacDonald at | | Reply

    Through­out the course of read­ing this novel, I can’t help but to view it as a cau­tion­ary tale writ­ten by an author who, unlike many, sees where humans’ inher­ent obses­sion with money and tech­nol­ogy and self-importance is lead­ing us. The char­ac­ter­i­za­tions of LNWIs and HNWIs rep­re­sents a strug­gle between socioe­co­nomic classes that is even present today (i.e., big busi­nesses and the top one per­cent ver­sus the other ninety nine per­cent). The strug­gle has proven to be too much and now the cit­i­zens are break­ing into a large scale revolt. Even as this revolt is tak­ing place, the HNWIs hardly seem moved or rat­tled at all that this rev­o­lu­tion is tak­ing place; this is evi­denced by Joshie Goldmann’s mes­sage to the Post-Human Ser­vices Share­hold­ers and Exec­u­tive Per­son­nel in chap­ter 19. He states “If reg­u­lar appa­rat trans­mis­sions cease for any rea­son, please look for Wapachung Con­tin­gency emer­gency scrolls and fol­low the direc­tions given. An excit­ing time is about to begin for us and the cre­ative econ­omy. We are all for­tu­nate, and, in an abstract way, blessed. Onward!” I think this a good quote that dis­plays the self­ish­ness and lack of empa­thy for any­one else in their dystopian world. Amidst the chaos and revolt, they are “excited” and “blessed” for their posi­tion and show lit­tle care for any­thing going on around them. I think this could be fore­shad­ow­ing in our own world to what it might be like to live in a world dom­i­nated by tech­nol­ogy and anti-social, self-important peo­ple — a world in which peo­ple are only con­cerned with them­selves and their own well-being.

    1. Alexandra P-Keller
      Alexandra P-Keller at | | Reply

      This totally relates to the dis­cus­sion scene in Chap­ter 20 where Lenny and Joshie are talk­ing about the cre­ative econ­omy. Joshie embod­ies the con­se­quences the tech­nol­ogy when you allow it con­sume your­self and your expe­ri­ence. I can even see how far this has been taken with Joshie’s resis­tance to let his own best friend Lenny not receive the treat­ments because he did not have the mon­e­tary fund for treat­ments. Through­out the book money seems to be the only thing stand­ing in the way of Lenny achiev­ing a longer life. He is con­stantly ref­er­enc­ing his amount of yuan and how the 239,000 from Rome was the amount he needed to start treat­ment. Not only does tech­nol­ogy define who you are, who you are defined to be defines your abil­ity to access tech­nol­ogy and there­fore all the medi­ated expe­ri­ences, such as long life and youth, that one can have access too. Joshie seems him­self as lucky and “blessed” but he is only blessed because he has the means to receive a bless­ing. This could be talked about in terms of cul­tural rep­re­sen­ta­tions and you can totally expand on this aspect of the book as a metaphor to our con­tem­po­rary cul­ture and who has access to its fullest capabilities.

  3. Camile Clarke
    Camile Clarke at | | Reply

    My appa­rat isn’t con­nect­ing. I can’t con­nect. It’s been almost a month since my last diary entry. I am so sorry. But I can’t con­nect in any mean­ing­ful way to any­one, even to you, diary.” –Lenny in chap­ter 22

    The depen­dence on the appa­rat is show­ing its true col­ors. Peo­ple are com­mit­ting sui­cide because they can­not live with­out it. Lenny can­not seem to con­nect with any­one. The social struc­ture of the world is break­ing down. Being free from being ranked is actu­ally caus­ing stress. Peo­ple need to know what oth­ers think of them, for oth­ers to deter­mine their place in the world. Life now does not seem as excit­ing. The lives of every­one in the novel were so inter­twined with the appa­rat and now it is so inter­est­ing to see how they are deal­ing with­out them.

    1. Betsy Main
      Betsy Main at | | Reply

      I found this “blow up” funny and also shock­ing because of the depen­dence of tech­nol­ogy. Part of the secu­rity instruc­tions say, “KEEP ÄPPÄRÄT FULLY CHARGED IF POSSIBLE. AWAIT INSTRUCTIONS.” This just shows how promi­nent these devices are. They expect every­one to have one as a main way to com­mu­ni­cate even in a dis­as­ter situation.

    2. Travis Ares Matt
      Travis Ares Matt at | | Reply

      I feel this con­cept is summed up well with a quote from later in the chap­ter, “Because we can’t con­nect to our appa­rati, we’re learn­ing to turn to each other”. In any way you look at it, hav­ing to learn ‘tra­di­tional’ inter­per­sonal com­mu­ni­ca­tions is com­i­cal. Even more so that this is solely because they lack the abil­ity to use their devices.

    3. Jamison Schaffnit
      Jamison Schaffnit at | | Reply

      This is some­thing that I was dis­cussing too, along with the impor­tance of Media in soci­ety. It seems as though peo­ple in the media have become more impor­tant than any other pro­fes­sion. In ch.19 you notice that they keep receiv­ing fright­en­ing announce­ments from the media about the US deficit and ter­ror­ist threats. This is some­thing that is already promi­nent in our media and is exag­ger­ated in the novel.

    4. Sydney Tappin
      Sydney Tappin at | | Reply

      I think this is really inter­est­ing because I feel like our soci­ety is kind of on the path toward this. Peo­ple are addicted to their phones and there is now such thing as phan­tom vibra­tion syn­drome. We have become com­pletely immersed in this tech­no­log­i­cal world and often for­get about the real world we are actu­ally liv­ing in.

  4. Travis Ares Matt
    Travis Ares Matt at | | Reply

    http://​goo​.gl/​k​n​m​4hc (had to put screen­shot in URL since it wouldn’t show up in here.

    One aspect/pattern I’ve observed in this novel is the exis­tence of a mate­ri­al­is­tic pop­u­lous that relies on their tech­nol­ogy to reas­sure them­selves of their rel­e­vance. They rely on their appa­rati to the point where it becomes part of their iden­tity, and placed many in a state of cri­sis once they were with­out. In the “Five-Jiao Men” chap­ter, this is made incred­i­bly clear in the very first para­graphs of the entry where Lenny writes of the recent sui­cides com­mit­ted by two teenagers who saw “no future with­out their appa­rati”, feel­ing life wasn’t worth liv­ing with­out the con­stant elec­tronic stim­u­la­tion. The lack of con­nec­tion left Lenny “itch­ing” for it, and him being more dis­tanced from his appa­rati com­par­a­tively to other char­ac­ters, it can eas­ily be said that many more were much worse off after The Rupture.

    1. Rebeca
      Rebeca at | | Reply

      Their obses­sion with their appa­rati is def­i­nitely some­thing that is extremely trou­bling. There is a whole chap­ter where Eunice just sends mes­sages to her friends and fam­ily even though she keeps get­ting an error mes­sage, “I bet I’m going to get an error mes­sage after I write this, but I feel like I have to write this any­way”. She is so enslaved by her appa­rati that she does not know who to talk to or what to do with­out it she kind of just stares at it. This made me think of the present when the power goes out and we are kind of forced to cre­ate other types of diver­sions for our­selves. All the while just wait­ing for the power to come back.

      1. Scott MacDonald
        Scott MacDonald at | | Reply

        Shteyn­gart is def­i­nitely point­ing at a real social prob­lem in today’s soci­ety. A lot of peo­ple, teens espe­cially, become obsessed with their cell phones and social media iden­ti­ties and they invest so much of their lives into it that a lot of them aren’t sure what to do or how to live with­out them. It’s a very trou­bling real­ity which undoubt­edly takes place in today’s soci­ety and a dystopia.

  5. Betsy Main
    Betsy Main at | | Reply

    I am focus­ing on the topic con­cern­ing tech­nol­ogy. I have noticed a cou­ple new exam­ples in these few chap­ters that enhance the impor­tance and expec­ta­tions of tech­nol­ogy in their world they live in. 

    I can com­mu­ni­cate with him eas­ier than I can with Lenny even though he doesn’t wear an äppärät for some rea­son and I can’t get his profile.”
    This quote stood out to me because it is shock­ing that she is sur­prised that she can com­mu­ni­cate bet­ter “in per­son” than through a device. Today that is the oppo­site because tone and emo­tion is still dif­fi­cult to com­mu­ni­cate over a device. This is becom­ing eas­ier with emo­jis and gifs but it isn’t the same as an in per­son conversation. 

    I was a very angry young man until I real­ized I didn’t have to die.”
    This other quote also stood out because tech­nol­ogy shouldn’t con­trol our emo­tions. It may influ­ence our emo­tions for a lim­ited time by mak­ing us laugh or angry over a post but by see­ing in this book that it can change a per­sons entire out­look on life is intense.

    1. Camile Clarke
      Camile Clarke at | | Reply

      My post was about how tech­nol­ogy has a hold over peo­ple and kind of cre­ates a false world that peo­ple want to live in. Both of your quotes demon­strate that com­pletely. It is shock­ing that Eunice can­not look past a device to really get to know Lenny and it actu­ally turns out that she kinda likes him. With the loss of these com­mu­ni­ca­tion devices peo­ple kind of seem lost and in extreme cases Lenny men­tions that peo­ple actu­ally com­mit­ted suicide.

    2. Davis Livingstone
      Davis Livingstone at | | Reply

      With regard to your first exam­ple, the sur­prise of sim­ply hav­ing or devel­op­ing closer con­nec­tions through inter­per­sonal inter­ac­tions out­side of media is very much in align­ment with the core themes of the book. How­ever, in your dis­cus­sion of tone and emo­tional con­veyance through media in our con­tem­po­rary world you could make con­nec­tions about how there is a com­fort in engag­ing a screen rather than the real per­son. I think that feel­ing is very preva­lent today and is bet­ter than stat­ing that tone or emo­tion is “still dif­fi­cult to communicate.”

  6. Jamison Schaffnit
    Jamison Schaffnit at | | Reply

    On the top­ics of dig­i­tal iden­tity and medi­ated expe­ri­ence, there is a recur­ring theme that I noticed through­out the novel, which is the impor­tance of media. It is inter­est­ing to point out, as we know the impor­tance of media in our soci­ety, how exag­ger­ated media impor­tance is in the novel. “My friends. My dear ones. We chat­ted in the typ­i­cally funny-sad way of the peo­ple in their late thir­ties about the things that used to make us young as Amy passed around a real joint, seed­less and moist, the kind that only Media peo­ple get”. This idea is promi­nent in this some­what future tense con­text, as the author is most def­i­nitely point­ing out the ris­ing medi­ated cul­ture in our present society.

    1. Camile Clarke
      Camile Clarke at | | Reply

      I would have to agree. How media is pre­sented in this book is like a neces­sity, like food and water. It is very impor­tant in that it dic­tates who peo­ple are. Every­one has to be con­nected in order to form real rela­tion­ships. Media is so ingrained in the lives of the char­ac­ters that they can­not see how it was neg­a­tively affect­ing their inter­ac­tion with the real world. There is a long­ing for media where there should be more social inter­ac­tion and fac­ing life head on instead of liv­ing in a very socially con­structed world.

    2. Alex Janney
      Alex Janney at | | Reply

      I also noticed the value placed on the media. It is con­stantly over­whelm­ing the lives of each char­ac­ter and is part of the rea­son the cul­ture is over-stimulated.

  7. Rebeca
    Rebeca at | | Reply

    I thought it was very inter­est­ing how through­out the book there is men­tion of the “Fal­lacy of Merely Exist­ing,” as if these peo­ple were mak­ing an effort to get more out of life or to actu­ally under­stand what is hap­pen­ing in other parts of the world. Maybe even striv­ing to be more cul­tured, a soci­ety of intel­lec­tu­als. How­ever, the tech­nol­ogy they are so obsessed with and their over-consumerist, vapid soci­ety makes this extremely dif­fi­cult and almost laughable. 

    I was a very angry young man until I real­ized I didn’t have to die. Some of us are so spe­cial, Eunice, we don’t have to suc­cumb to the Fal­lacy of Merely Exist­ing. Maybe you’re spe­cial too, huh? Any­way, I can help you get a job, so you don’t have to worry about that part.”

    If they know they can extend their lives they should spend that time explor­ing the world and becom­ing more knowl­edgable, and not flirt­ing with girls that are fifty years younger than them and offer­ing a job in retail for being “special”.

    1. Tom Steinbach
      Tom Steinbach at | | Reply

      I think your point is very valid and inter­est­ing, but would the char­ac­ters of this story agree. These char­ac­ters do not seem to care at all about “see­ing the world” they are too linked to tech­nol­ogy to rec­og­nize the beauty of nature. For me I think that is part of Shteyngart’s point. No mat­ter how long one is to be on the earth in the story’s real­ity, they must spend money while being a HNWI. That is the only rea­son for them to be there to help fur­ther the cre­ative economy.

  8. Khyler Alvez-Satterlund
    Khyler Alvez-Satterlund at | | Reply

    My quote:
    https://i.gyazo.com/fd5688ffe99bdd7a6b383072e6b6f697.png

    This part hap­pens at the very begin­ning of when New York is attacked, and shows just how much dig­i­tal iden­tity means in this world. People’s lives are val­ued based on how good their sta­tis­tics are for finances and looks. It is the imme­di­ate reac­tion and go to descrip­tion of whether or not peo­ple will be okay, not where they are or how much they are deter­mined, but how high their num­bers are. Even in a cri­sis like this these things take priority.

    1. Rosemary Mohr
      Rosemary Mohr at | | Reply

      I also wrote about this chap­ter and I thought it was very inter­est­ing how there imme­di­ate reac­tion was not how to live, almost as if there fate was already decided for them so why bother going against it. I would almost com­pare your obser­va­tion to cur­rent day because I think if the world was under attack, we are sav­ing the most pow­er­ful, famous peo­ple first, not in the same way as the role of dig­i­tal iden­tity plays in the book, but under sim­i­lar circumstances.

  9. Rosemary Mohr
    Rosemary Mohr at | | Reply

    Some­thing I observed in the novel is how much tech­nol­ogy and media con­sumes a per­son and their every­day activ­i­ties. Although Lenny isn’t con­sid­ered to be the most tech­no­log­i­cally “savvy,” tech­nol­ogy effects his life just as much as any one else in the novel. A good exam­ple from chap­ter 17 would be the Cri­sis­Net; con­stantly giv­ing reports in a state of emergency. 

    Cri­sis­Net: URGENT: AMERICAN RESTORATION AUTHORITY RAISES THREAT LEVEL TO NEW YORK, LOS ANGELES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO RED++IMMINENT DANGER” 

    Shout­ing and grab­bing on to one another, the excite­ment of what we always sus­pected would hap­pen tinged with a the real­ity that we were actu­ally, finally, in the mid­dle of the movie..” –Lenny

    Media con­nected to tech­nol­ogy become so appar­ent in every­day life that even in a state of panic and dan­ger, Lenny com­pares it to a movie.

  10. Alex Janney
    Alex Janney at | | Reply

    Duh! Any­way, that rhe­sus mon­key paint­ing was so good I don’t want your tal­ent to go to waste, Eunice. You’re super-gifted. This many sound weird, but you kind of remind me of me when I was younger. Except you’re sweeter. I was a very angry young man until I real­ized I didn’t have to die. Some of us are so spe­cial, Eunice, we don’t have to suc­cumb to the Fal­lacy of Merely Exist­ing. Maybe you’re spe­cial too, huh? Any­way, I can help you get a job, so you don’t have to worry about the part. And I’ll take a class with you. It’ll be so great!!! You can make more ani­mal draw­ings of Lenny and then give them to him for his birth­day in the fall.” — Goldmann 

    It thought this pas­sage was par­tic­u­larly inter­est­ing because it specif­i­cally exem­pli­fied the dis­cus­sion we had on Mon­day. The chap­ter starts out by fur­ther exem­pli­fy­ing Goldmann’s obses­sion with youth when he asks Eunice to refer to him by his first name, despite their rela­tion­ship as acquain­tances. Gold­mann is really per­sis­tent with Eunice and is push­ing the idea of immor­tal­ity and the abil­ity in todays gen­er­a­tion to cir­cum­vent death by choos­ing to not “suc­cumb to the Fal­lacy of Merely Exist­ing”. This demon­strates the con­cept of medi­ated com­mu­ni­ca­tion because Goldmann’s con­stant inter­ac­tion with tech­nol­ogy and this gen­er­a­tions “always-on” culture.

  11. Samantha McMenemy
    Samantha McMenemy at | | Reply

    When I was read­ing about the appa­rati not work­ing and peo­ple com­mit­ting sui­cide over it, it was so ridicu­lous that I could hardly take it seriously. 

    …they couldn’t see a future with­out their appa­rati… He needed to be ranked, to know his place in this world… We are all bored out of our fuck­ing minds.”

    But after think­ing about the rise of tech­nol­ogy in mod­ern cul­ture, as extreme an exam­ple as it is, is it so far off from the truth? Peo­ple have become increas­ingly depen­dent on tech­nol­ogy and online net­works to com­mu­ni­cate with each other, cre­ate an iden­tity for them­selves, and find enter­tain­ment that they strug­gle to have an in-person con­ver­sa­tion longer than five minutes.

    1. Ryan Long
      Ryan Long at | | Reply

      From what I have seen in today’s world this is true. When peo­ple for­get their phones at home, life seems to become much less man­age­able, or at least much more prob­lem­atic to deal with. It seems like a piece of you is miss­ing, and you notice that for the whole day. It is akin to an addic­tion for many. With those trends, it is very likely that in the future we will see sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tions that those in the story with­out their appa­rati are going through. As a soci­ety, we have become absolutely depen­dent on these devices, when only a few years ago we did not need them to han­dle our daily lives.

      I wrote some­thing very sim­i­lar and men­tioned how there are many peo­ple that do not under­stand social inter­ac­tions or can­not han­dle them, but have boun­ti­ful dig­i­tal lives. That abil­ity to inter­act with oth­ers for longer peri­ods of time seems to be become scarce as time goes on.

    2. Khyler Alvez-Satterlund
      Khyler Alvez-Satterlund at | | Reply

      It’s crazy how much tech­nol­ogy is a part of the lifestyle. I thought it was ridicu­lous when they were arrest­ing the man off of the plane for not hav­ing an appa­rat and then it just got ridicu­lous that peo­ple were killing them­selves because of it. That’s just how inte­gral tech­nol­ogy is to their lives, and it almost mir­rors how much it is today. (Though obvi­ously not to the extent of peo­ple killing themselves) 

      Peo­ple are sim­i­larly attached today which is why you see them always on them, and mak­ing it the #1 pri­or­ity to find a charger when it runs out of battery.

      1. Scott MacDonald
        Scott MacDonald at | | Reply

        I think cell phones were orig­i­nally cre­ated to keep peo­ple orga­nized and con­nected regard­less of where they are or what they are doing. Cell phones have so many help­ful uses and tools that peo­ple do invest much of their lives in them. How­ever, it got out of hand and peo­ple became addicted to the “lifestyle” of ease and con­ve­nience and I think we’re see­ing the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of that now in today’s soci­ety where peo­ple are being so con­trolled by their devices. Shteyn­gart pro­vides a real­is­tic drama­ti­za­tion of what the future holds if we con­tinue down this path, i.e., as you men­tioned, peo­ple killing them­selves over their apparats.

  12. Ryan Long
    Ryan Long at | | Reply

    How strongly peo­ple iden­tify them­selves with their media devices and their online pro­files show how tech­no­log­i­cally depen­dent we as a soci­ety are. 

    Four young peo­ple com­mit­ted sui­cide in our build­ing com­plexes, and two of them wrote sui­cide notes about how they couldn’t see a future with­out their appa­rati. One wrote, quite elo­quently, about how he “reached out to life,” but found there only “walls and thoughts and faces,” which weren’t enough.”

    To them, the phys­i­cal com­po­si­tion of peo­ple do not make up any sig­nif­i­cance. It is merely a shell that houses the true iden­tity or per­son. The appa­rati to them is the only thing that mat­ters. It is their iden­tity, and with­out it they are lost and con­fused. It makes me think about how today there are many socially awk­ward peo­ple that can only com­mu­ni­cate through dig­i­tal means. Here, it seems like many have com­pletely for­got­ten how to inter­act face to face, like it is not even an option.

    1. Rosemary Mohr
      Rosemary Mohr at | | Reply

      It inter­est­ing that peo­ple care so much about there dig­i­tal iden­tity, espe­cially at a young age in the novel, while Lenny is still writ­ing in a jour­nal. It seems as if they are in two dif­fer­ent worlds. I agree, I can actu­ally see­ing that being a prob­lem for future gen­er­a­tions based on the gen­er­a­tions after ours who have not lived with out media.

  13. Tom Steinbach
    Tom Steinbach at | | Reply

    That’s what tyrants do, I guess. They make you covet their atten­tion; they make you con­fuse atten­tion for mercy.” This quote from Super Sad True Love Story is very inter­est­ing to me. For me this quote is pok­ing fun at the tech­nol­ogy of this real­ity, not any real tyrant. The peo­ple of this real­ity have become so dig­i­tally enthralled that they are brain dead to the out­side world and it’s goings on. The main goal of the soci­ety is to cre­ate the “best” dig­i­tal iden­tity because that is iden­tity in this world. The char­ac­ters are not wor­ried about the world being split into two groups instead they are only wor­ried about per­sonal prob­lems, and out­ward appear­ances. Every­thing for these char­ac­ters is medi­ated through their aparati. They do not expe­ri­ence the world, instead they let tech­nol­ogy do that for them, and then get filled in on the key points.

  14. Sydney Tappin
    Sydney Tappin at | | Reply

    My hair would con­tinue to gray, and then one day, it would fall out entirely, and then, on a day mean­ing­lessly close to the present one, mean­ing­lessly like the present one, I would dis­ap­pear from the earth. And all these emo­tions, all these yearn­ings, all these data, if that helps to clinch the enor­mity of what I’m talk­ing about, would be gone.”

    In terms of iden­tity I think this pas­sage sends a pretty strong mes­sage. We as humans are so much more than rat­ings and num­bers. When we die those num­bers are just old infor­ma­tion and what lives on is the legacy you’ve built up. That’s what makes human­ity such a divine phe­nom­e­non is that we hold emo­tion and integrity and per­son­al­ity. Per­son­al­ity is not a thing that an appa­rat can mea­sure. I think that is one of the main themes of this book, that tech­nol­ogy can only define so much and take us so far. There is a cer­tain point where tech­nol­ogy can advance us so much before it starts to limit or take a toll on our humanity.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: